Golden Arch Poker Star Ratings…
I am very confused, Golden Arch has this system of rating players using stars.
Up to three Bronze stars = a pretty decent player
Up to three Silver Stars= a good player
Up to three Gold Stars= a really good player.
Here is why I’m confused, I’ve sharkscoped just about every player play against in the sit and goes and most of the 3 gold star players I’ve checked have horrible stats. One tonight has a -13% ROI and one 3 bronze star player is labele a Fish with a -29% ROI
It seems to me either these guys are crushing the cash games enough to counteract their horrible Tourny play, or the Star System is very very flawed.
Has any one else noticed this?
This entry was posted on February 10, 2009 at 4:18 am and is filed under Uncategorized with tags Golden Arch, Poker, Rating, stars. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
June 10, 2009 at 7:18 pm
Stars have nothing in common with the skills or results;
it’s only based on the “Comp Points”, which are won by payin entry fees or playin cash games;
so a gold player is just a really old tourney player, or a big cash fame player
could be more experimented, but nothing to see with his results